<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chuck. Chuck. Chuck.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.immediatemedium.org/chuck-chuck-chuck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.immediatemedium.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: “Chuck.Chuck.Chuck.” -- Immediate Medium « IRT Theater - Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.immediatemedium.org/chuck-chuck-chuck/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>“Chuck.Chuck.Chuck.” -- Immediate Medium « IRT Theater - Beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://immediatemedium.org/?page_id=43#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] http://immediatemedium.org/chuck-chuck-chuck/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://immediatemedium.org/chuck-chuck-chuck/" rel="nofollow">http://immediatemedium.org/chuck-chuck-chuck/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john mccann</title>
		<link>http://www.immediatemedium.org/chuck-chuck-chuck/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>john mccann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://immediatemedium.org/?page_id=43#comment-16</guid>
		<description>The production had a very strong essence, distilling the &quot;vibe&quot; of Faulkner into a 90 minute play. The scenic elements, the staging, the actors all worked in concert. The choice of music, and performers were all spot-on, capturing the flavor, never distracting. I do agree about the videos, seemed distracting, like a disparate element that was sort of added on, didn&#039;t really fit, but ultimately did not take away from the power of the performance. The use of sound effects was particularly excellent. I look forward to your next production, and to contributing to your endeavors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The production had a very strong essence, distilling the &#8220;vibe&#8221; of Faulkner into a 90 minute play. The scenic elements, the staging, the actors all worked in concert. The choice of music, and performers were all spot-on, capturing the flavor, never distracting. I do agree about the videos, seemed distracting, like a disparate element that was sort of added on, didn&#8217;t really fit, but ultimately did not take away from the power of the performance. The use of sound effects was particularly excellent. I look forward to your next production, and to contributing to your endeavors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.immediatemedium.org/chuck-chuck-chuck/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://immediatemedium.org/?page_id=43#comment-13</guid>
		<description>This is the good stuff, the nutmeat we are looking for in the heart of theater. It has everything, a dramatic story with some beautiful text (this will make you want to re-read Faulkner), video, live music and dancing, lots of dirt, a casket and free Budweiser. What more could you want?

This is experimental and innovative theater that is completely accessible.

My main questions were about the use of video projections. I liked them, but they sort of disappeared early on and there didn&#039;t seem to be a strong logic or aesthetic reason why. Everything else looks so dirt cheap real (in a good way!); I&#039;m not sure that projections don&#039;t detract from that appeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the good stuff, the nutmeat we are looking for in the heart of theater. It has everything, a dramatic story with some beautiful text (this will make you want to re-read Faulkner), video, live music and dancing, lots of dirt, a casket and free Budweiser. What more could you want?</p>
<p>This is experimental and innovative theater that is completely accessible.</p>
<p>My main questions were about the use of video projections. I liked them, but they sort of disappeared early on and there didn&#8217;t seem to be a strong logic or aesthetic reason why. Everything else looks so dirt cheap real (in a good way!); I&#8217;m not sure that projections don&#8217;t detract from that appeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annaliese</title>
		<link>http://www.immediatemedium.org/chuck-chuck-chuck/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Annaliese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://immediatemedium.org/?page_id=43#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so happy that I could see this performance.
It was very creative and the actors really brought it to life. Loved it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so happy that I could see this performance.<br />
It was very creative and the actors really brought it to life. Loved it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
