Chuck. Chuck. Chuck. is a collage of performance, video, music, and dance that uses William Faulkner’s novel As I Lay Dying as a departure point for a broader examination of failure, secular faith and family.
The subject of the piece, and of the novel, is a family’s arduous attempt to return their dead mother to her birthplace for burial. It is an endeavor repeatedly described as pointless and futile by all who encounter them on their travels. Failure follows the Bundren family throughout with the daughter’s inability to procure an abortion drug, a son’s thwarted efforts to burn his mother’s coffin and a flood that causes the family to lose their mules and another son to lose his leg. These failures are consumptive and spectacular, upending the already delicate balance that has allowed this family to survive. Through a combination of emotional inadequacy, dysfunction and unhappy circumstance (complicated by their social and economic position), we bear witness to the disintegration of a family and the failure of love or even familial bonds to rescue them.
Directed by
JJ Lind
Choreography
Liz Vacco
Production Design
Maki Takenouchi
Sound/Video
Rob Ramirez
Musical Direction
Jacob Cooper
Performers
Robin Aigner
Megan Campisi
Suzie Chung
Max Dana
Brady Jenkins
LeAnn Lind
Michael Rushton
Caroline Shaw
Hugh Sinclair*
Siobhan Towey
Liz Vacco
Ben Vershbow
* Appearing courtesy of Actors’ Equity Association
Chuck. Chuck. Chuck.
New York, New York
2008-2009

3 Comments
I’m so happy that I could see this performance.
It was very creative and the actors really brought it to life. Loved it!
Posted February 21, 2009 at 10:31 pm by Annaliese
This is the good stuff, the nutmeat we are looking for in the heart of theater. It has everything, a dramatic story with some beautiful text (this will make you want to re-read Faulkner), video, live music and dancing, lots of dirt, a casket and free Budweiser. What more could you want?
This is experimental and innovative theater that is completely accessible.
My main questions were about the use of video projections. I liked them, but they sort of disappeared early on and there didn’t seem to be a strong logic or aesthetic reason why. Everything else looks so dirt cheap real (in a good way!); I’m not sure that projections don’t detract from that appeal.
Posted February 22, 2009 at 6:52 pm by Kevin
The production had a very strong essence, distilling the “vibe” of Faulkner into a 90 minute play. The scenic elements, the staging, the actors all worked in concert. The choice of music, and performers were all spot-on, capturing the flavor, never distracting. I do agree about the videos, seemed distracting, like a disparate element that was sort of added on, didn’t really fit, but ultimately did not take away from the power of the performance. The use of sound effects was particularly excellent. I look forward to your next production, and to contributing to your endeavors.
Posted March 27, 2009 at 9:29 am by john mccann
One Trackback
[...] http://immediatemedium.org/chuck-chuck-chuck/ [...]
© 2008 Immediate Medium